Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Augustine's Garden

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete per consensus as not meeting notability set forth at WP:MUSIC. Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 18:47, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Augustine's Garden

Augustine's Garden (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Band appears not to be notable; according to article have only sold 1000 copies of 1 album. No independent sources have been added for verifiability. Article was created with many spam links (which have since been removed). Ioeth _{(talk contribs friendly)} 20:30, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

• Delete as nom. Ioeth _{(talk contribs friendly)} 20:31, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
• Why Delete? . I was a founding member none of the links were spam, they were to show notability that we were an active band. The 1000 thousand copies was from us sending our ADAT tapes to Disc Makers to have 1000 copies with a UPC code produced. Look at the client list at Audio-Chroma.com, Search in Google under Augustine's Garden and we're the first thing above all else that comes up. I don't understand this Wikipedia thing as to how to decide if this a legit band. Slingshot 57 are my personal friends and they are completely independent which is exactly the Augustine's Garden case. So how can one like myself add an honest article without someone saying it's not honest? I can call independent sources and have them add for verifiability if that's what it takes. But I think this is silly. No spammer would be this bold to prove relevance. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zaxo (talk • contribs) 21:50, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
• Delete as non-notable. Nothing to demonstrated notability per guidelines. The question isn't whether or not it is a legitimate band, but whether or not it is a notable enough band to be included in wikipedia. There are criteria to meet, see Wikipedia:Notability (music). Trivial mention in The Observer here but that's about all I could find. --BelovedFreak 22:32, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
• Delete I read the guidelines. Go ahead and delete as I already went ahead and got rid of the info on the pages. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zaxo (talk • contribs) 9 November 2007

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.