Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Augusoft

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Punkmorten 21:41, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Augusoft, Lumens, Lifelong Learning Management Systems, Cem Erdem

  ATTENTION!

If you came here because somebody asked you to, or you read a message on a forum, please note that this is not a vote, but rather a discussion to establish a consensus amongst Wikipedia editors on whether an article is suitable for this encyclopedia. We have policies and guidelines to help us decide this, and deletion decisions are made on the merits of the arguments, not by counting heads (or socks).

You can participate and give your opinion. Please sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Happy editing!
Comments made by suspected single purpose accounts can be tagged using {{subst:spa|username}}.

A private software company (no assertions of notability), its main product (no assertions of notability), a list comprising that one software product, and its CEO. —Quarl (talk) 2006-10-09 18:52Z

  • Delete as non-notable / vanity / spam. JonHarder 19:30, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Agreed. Delete Emeraude 20:23, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. I could swear we've been through this before with this company, complete with Augusoft blanking the AfD tags, as he's been doing here. Fan-1967 20:27, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Do Not Delete, I would understand a proposal to expand the stubs but deletion is a bit extreme. Please stop vandalising the articles. Thanks. Augusoft
  • Augusoft is a notable private company in Minnesota, I would consider the articles as stubs...—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.163.207.52 (talk • contribs) .
  • Do not delete articles have great potential, should be expanded... —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 63.87.125.75 (talk • contribs) .
  • Delete all per nom. You may say to yourself, "Wow, 'Augusoft' gets 119,000 Google hits!" If you do, I shall respond, "Wow! Only 80 of those hits are unique!" -- Kicking222 22:42, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete all per nom. Resolute 23:09, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete vanity spam. ReverendG 00:20, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete non notable, spam, vanity  Funky Monkey  (talk)  02:06, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete all. NN. References are press releases. Spam. --Sleepyhead 07:13, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete, adspam / vanity. Deizio talk 13:46, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete all, possibly speedy delete all as adspam/vanity per new advertising coöption policy. -Smerdis of Tlön 14:10, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Do Not Delete,Deletion is not necessary88.198.196.117 14:59, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Don't Delete, Why delete the Lifelong Learning Management Systems Article? There are tons of such systems out there 85.214.73.63 16:12, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete all Non-notable, advertising. OhNoitsJamie Talk 18:09, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Do not Delete reads like ads but can be cleaned out 131.94.133.12 18:40, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Please stop spamming this discussion. Deizio talk 20:07, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Or, to put it another way, the anonymous users arguing against deletion should be aware that votes that ignore the stated reasons for deletion, and that do not address Wikipedia guidelines, will not weigh in the decision. Fan-1967 20:15, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Indeed :) See also the links in the warning template above about socks and single purpose accounts too. Trust me, we've seen it all before. Deizio talk 20:26, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Do NoT Delete! - Enough with the censorship, you guys are responsible for U.S. becoming a police state. There are a lot of ERP vendors and software listed in Wikipedia why not LMS vendors? See Enterprise_resource_planning -- Keynesian 15:33, 11 October 2006 (UTC) — Possible single purpose account: Keynesian (talk • contribs) has made few or no other contributions outside this topic. Account created 15 minutes before this edit.
  • Strong delete all Funny how most of the keep requests are coming from IPs. These stubs are patent advertising spam. Lord Rasputin 19:44, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Strong keep all but Cem Erdem, delete Cem Erdem per norm, non notable. Keep rest. Not everyone likes to register 69.56.216.142 14:37, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Registering is not the issue. The issue is whether people's comments recognize Wikipedia standards. A hundred votes that ignore the standards will still count for nothing. Fan-1967 15:36, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.