Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Atala T

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete both, sorry that the author worked so hard on these, but the subjects aren't close to being notable. NawlinWiki 03:15, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Atala T

Atala T (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)
Atala T Toolbar (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

No sources to show notability of this small ISP, or of the less significant browser toolbar. Alksub 06:05, 23 September 2007 (UTC)

    • Please do not delete my articles, I am the arthor of both Atala T articles and just because Atala T is not commonly known does not give you the right to just delte my artice. If you would as to be so kind as to look at my talk page, you will see that I have stuggled to have my articles on wikipedia and to have them in the "wikipedia" standard but now it seems like people are doing it just for no real apparent reason. I have listed resources and thier accurate website and formated it and eveything. Alot of work as went into these articles. Atala T is not known because it is a very small ISP/ Web service provider, I know this because I personally know the person who is the CEO of the company, Its not like this is just some random article that just appeared over night. I would really appreciate it if my article is not deleted and I will do my best to add more usefull information to the article. Please reply to my talk page.

--Muriness 23:14, 23 September 2007 (UTC)

    • Delete Big source problems (i.e. none). No evidence of notability. UnitedStatesian 23:39, 23 September 2007 (UTC)


    • Please tell me how it has no sources when both the web sites are listed on the pages?

--Muriness 00:18, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

    • Wikipedia requires independent sources - in this case, sources like articles or websites not connected with the company. You can't use a company's website as a source for an article about the company or its products. UnitedStatesian 00:41, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

No one has told me that before as I am still new to editing on this website, and thats still no excuse to delete m article, I hope it is not deleted because I can still fix it up. --Muriness 03:15, 24 September 2007 (UTC)


Please dont delete my article, I really worked hard to create it in the "wikipedia standards" and It would be like the 5th or 6th article I tryed to create on this web site! It is not advertising in any way, shape or form, please do not delete my article, I will get more sources for both pages if thats all it needs. --Muriness


Delete Sadly im gona have to go with delete. Mostly by the fact that it has only a hunderds of user not even peaking into the 1000's. ForeverDEAD 21:53, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

Comment Please do not "beg" for us to keep your articals its more pitaful then a reason not to delete ForeverDEAD 21:53, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

Now I'd bet if I was some big time editor on wikipedia, my article would not even come close to being here. I really dont see what is wrong with my article but if alowed for it to be kept on here I will make the nessecary changes. --Muriness 22:14, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

No no no, The main problom is that its not notable. It even says it doesnt even have a thousand people using it. This artical is greatly written and if the subject was notable enough im sure it would be kept ForeverDEAD 22:17, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

So basically I need to start this all over again for like the 6 or 5th time. If my article is deleted I dont think I will created another artcile because this is terrible --Muriness 03:20, 28 September 2007 (UTC)

Dude you make great articals just on the wrong subjects. You just have to make them on diffent notable subjects. And rember begging with us isnt going to get your artical not deleted ForeverDEAD 23:40, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.