Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Astrobotany

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) 12:24, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Astrobotany, Astrobiosphere, Astrometeorology, Astrooceanography, Astrosciences

Neologism, OR, etc. — Dunc|☺ 20:53, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

• Delete: ^{[Check Google hits]}. Seems orchestrated by a notable man, Gavriil Adrianovich Tikhov, but I can't find a single reliable source that mentions Astrobotany outside of his speculative work. (|-- UlTiMuS 21:05, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

• Delete all: All neologisms, all WP:NOR violations, all WP:VER violations created by one WP user with an original idea (seen here and here). ... Kenosis 22:16, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

• I've merged several almost idencical AfD's into this one for convenience. Copies of relevant discussions follow. (|-- UlTiMuS 21:13, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

Astrometeorology

neologism, OR, etc. Also, This suggests it is long range weather forecasting rather than extra-terrestrial weather studying.— Dunc|☺ 20:56, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

Astrosciences

This term is a neologism that has no definition or accepted meaning. Violation of WP:OR (it's a made-up word), WP:VER (not verifiable), WP:RS (Source(s) of "term" are not-notable at all), WP:NOT (not a dictionary, especially for proposed neologisms not from reliable source(s)) Kenosis 17:00, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per non. Also, the term takes the pretense of relating to science, but the few internert sources there are seem to be related to pseudoscience or science fiction. •Jim62sch• 21:08, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete (probably), that is unless the WP:NOR, the pseudoscience (astrology) and the science fiction are removed, and articles rewritten to discuss the similarities and differences between astronomy, astrogeology, astrobiology, cosmology, etc, when it might be worth reconsidering. Until then, tho, delly. — Dunc|☺ 16:13, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
  • On second thoughts, redirect (no merge) to space science, which discusses exact;y the abpve. — Dunc|☺ 16:15, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.