Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Article on Plone Book

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete -- Joolz 20:09, 12 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Article on Plone Book

This is a review or an advertisement, not an article (despite claiming to be one). It's also mistitled, articles shouldn't be named "Article on Foobar" but merely "Foobar". It doesn't even explain what this "Plone" thingy actually is. I've certainly never heard of it. Delete. — JIP | Talk 07:53, 5 September 2005 (UTC)

• Speedy delete. Wikipedia is WP:NOT a place to post book reviews or to conduct business (paeg has a "Buy the book"-link). - Mgm|^(talk) 08:46, September 5, 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy delete. Concur with above. --Hullbr3ach 11:51, 5 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete generic tech book with poor article name. Mindmatrix 14:35, 5 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Ad. / Peter ^Isotalo 17:01, 5 September 2005 (UTC)

Now the article looks more or less ok. The article should be deleted in case of advertiseing intention. But after the styling it's fine. The problem lies in the name it seems. (preceding unsigned comment by Arnabbh (talk · contribs) 09:40, 12 September 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.