Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arthur L. Quinn

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 07:27, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Arthur L. Quinn

Arthur L. Quinn (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Prod removed several times, this article is of a seemingly not notable subject, its in a right mess and failing WP:V. — Rlest 12:29, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete, I see no evidence of this man's notability in the article or on Google. Closest is the captain of a floating nightclub from the forties, but that doesn't grab me as notable, even if it is the same chap. Lankiveil 12:41, 23 July 2007 (UTC).
  • Delete Despite the fact that the article is largely a mess of irrelevant interwiki links, it's clearly the vanity page of someone who I can find nothing notable on.--Sethacus 15:57, 23 July 2007 (UTC) (formerly Ispy1981)
  • Delete too bad it doesn't meet criteria for speedy. It doesn't assert notability, and there is no notability. Just some guy that was in the military. --sumnjim talk with me·changes 16:16, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. Command Sergeant Major is a highly accomplished position, but accomplishment is not the same as notability. --Dhartung | Talk 20:38, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. Also appears to be a vanity page; the creator was User:Kingsmen00. --SigPig |SEND - OVER 07:01, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete or Userfy Beat me to it. User page of article creator says he is Arthur L Quinn. Sgt Major of the Air Force is notable, Command Sgt Major generally isn't. Horrorshowj 19:32, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Userfy to User:Kingsmen00 -- but I am not an admin. Bearian 22:09, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment Prod shouldn't have had to be removed several times. Once prod is contested, it needs to be AFD'd. hbdragon88
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.