Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anuragam

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Redirect to Bosco Seva Kendra —Quarl (talk) 2006-11-20 02:04Z

[edit] Anuragam

Anuragam (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Admirable organization but according to Google unfortunately non-notable. Full of Original research MartinDK 15:26, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

  • Weak Delete - The nom says it all. Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 15:46, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. — Indon (reply) — 16:27, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletions. -- Ageo020 (T • C) 18:02, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete as orginal research and non-notable. Hello32020 22:14, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Strong Keep-Google hits must not be taken as a yardstick in Asian related AfD's. Widely circulated news papers in Andhra Pradesh are in Telugu language. News reports from Telugu dailies are not available in google eventhough it have lakhs of copies. In this contest we have to consult with wikipedians from Andhrapradesh. Let them to tell the organisation is notable or not...!  Nileena joseph (Talk|Contribs) 04:52, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment Definitely not Original Research. It is pretty well verifiable. Can't imagine as to how few guys thought this as original research  Doctor Bruno  20:36, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per everything above and it seems spammy. •Elomis• 02:56, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Merge with Bosco Seva Kendra. utcursch | talk 12:02, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

*Weak Keep - nileena's logic strikes me.Bakaman Bakatalk 05:21, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete - wow it sahould perhaps be userfied or "organization about me"-fied.Bakaman Bakatalk 19:40, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.