Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anti-Croatian sentiment

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was speedy: fork of Croatophobia. The content is preserved in Croatophobia/To merge for merging. `'mikka (t) 18:17, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Anti-Croatian sentiment

Relisting. Previously was tagged by a tag pointin to AFD of a different article, which is against rules: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Croatophobia. My vote is to keep, cleanup: unlike "Croatophobia" (which I voted to merge), the title is not a neologism, neutral, and reflects the real, documented phenomenon. `'mikka (t) 23:12, 17 May 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete - this is pointless, we can write about Anti-"any nation" sentiment. --serbiana - talk 23:27, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete, this is (very) POV right now and is bound to remain POV in my opinion. The title is made up of English words, yes, but you still get slightly more than 30 hits for "anti Croatian sentiment" (quoted) on Google. Also, most part of the article appears to be original research. LjL 23:36, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
    • POV is not valid reason for deletion. POV is reason for NPOV-cleanup. `'mikka (t) 01:55, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
      • Perhaps you didn't notice the part where I said "and it is bound to remain POV". LjL 14:37, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. POV is not a valid reason for deletion on its own, but a title that will only ever be a POV article is. Stifle (talk) 11:04, 18 May 2006 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.