Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Annette Radziszewski

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Speedy Delete. Non-notable, all history looks like a bad joke. --Pablo D. Flores (Talk) 16:36, 30 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Annette Radziszewski

Seems like a joke. Only put it here instead of speedying it on the off chance I'm missing something. Daniel Case 04:07, 30 December 2005 (UTC)

• Delete Joke page--Looper5920 04:08, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete nn bio (if not a joke) google search reveals only a person at "Loyola Academy in Wilmette, Illinois (IL)" with that name --Pboyd04 04:12, 30 December 2005 (UTC)

I'm sorry, but you're missing something. I wrote the article and it is quite true, unfortunately it was edited to contain various absurdities (e.g. Pulitzer Prize, Nobel Prize, engagement, etc.) The think tank, sociological ties, and Xiu Xiu are very real (though moderately obscure outside a very select group).

Maybe, but you didn't even bother to sign this comment. And truth alone does not establish notability. Daniel Case 04:18, 30 December 2005 (UTC)

Note improvements.

Simple edits are not necessarily improvements. I see nothing new that would establish notability. Daniel Case 04:35, 30 December 2005 (UTC)

i cant offer much to this but when i was studying at the University of Gdansk (Uniwersytet Gdański) i remember reading a study in the Polski Dziennik Sociologiczny that cited the work of aneta radziszewski... maybe the same person? i tried googling it but i dont think the journal is online.

• Delete. Non-notable biography. No Guru 05:27, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy delete, no reasonable claim to notability is made. -- Kjkolb 07:39, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete nn academic. Can the author cite papers published in peer-reviewed journals of note or place her in context with her academic discipline? -- (aeropagitica)  09:10, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete - not-notable or hoax -- SGBailey 09:49, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete Note the article has been vandalised - but all versions of it appear non-notable to me. Dlyons493 Talk 09:56, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete as poor joke, hoax, attack page, etc. Ifnord 16:18, 30 December 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.