Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anime Fight

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 16:41, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Anime Fight

Anime Fight (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

An article about a category of fan-made maps for Warcraft III. Doesn't appear to be notable. Unverifiable (WP:V), no reliable sources (WP:RS) and is original research (WP:NOR). Additionally, it talks about how to play such maps, violating the policy that Wikipedia is not a game guide or a manual. NeoChaosX (talk, walk) 08:48, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

ATTENTION! If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on a forum, please note that this is not a majority vote, but rather a discussion to establish a consensus among Wikipedia editors on whether a page is suitable for this encyclopedia. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines to help us decide this, and deletion decisions are made on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes. Nonetheless, you are welcome to participate and express your opinions. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments by suspected single-purpose accounts can be tagged using {{subst:spa|username}}

• Delete per nom. Warcruft. MER-C 14:04, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - seems like WP:OR and fails WP:RS and WP:V. It's typical fan work, which is really great, but unfortunately not really suitable for Wikipedia. Jayden54 15:02, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete fan maps, like fanfiction, must go. Obviously also fails WP:V, WP:RS, etc. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 15:17, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
• If you want to delete this because it's a "warcraft map", why not delete DOTA as well?
  • Re-read my nomination. That's not the only reason I'm putting it up for deletion. And if that's non-notable and unsourced, that too will eventually get deleted. NeoChaosX (talk, walk) 18:48, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete, it's not Defense of the Ancients. New Notability Standard: When Swedish techno artists start writing songs about playing it, then we can have an article on it. Night Gyr (talk/Oy) 19:03, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been added to the list of CVG deletions. PresN 20:20, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete , Warcruft. Non-Notable, Unsourced. SirFozzie 23:33, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. DotA is pretty much my standard for determining map notability, and this thing doesn't even come close. --Alan Au 06:08, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete as per nom and above comments. It's a game guide for a non-notable custom map for Warcraft III. --Scottie theNerd 16:56, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete fails WP:OR and WP:RS Alan Shatte 22:00, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per discussion above.Jessica Anne Stevens 22:32, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Fails WP:V, WP:RS, WP:OR per above. Paul D. Meehan 05:23, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
• 'Delete per all discussion above. Joel Jimenez 04:18, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.