Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Animatec

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Speedy Delete. Voice of All @|Esperanza|E M 03:16, 26 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Animatec

The first part of the page is not in English, and the translation at the bottom seems to be spam. Reyk 08:11, 19 October 2005 (UTC)

  • Delete per nomination. Reyk 08:11, 19 October 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete; advertisment and/or vanity WP:VAIN. I would say userfy, but the author of this article has also written Paulo Ramos, which I am going to nominate. Paolo Liberatore (Talk) 14:56, 19 October 2005 (UTC)
  • Comment; I think this article is a candidate for speedy deletion under CSD8, blatant copyright infringement, since it contains a copyright notice at the bottom. I am notifying the author about the copyright problem.-Walter Siegmund 18:05, 19 October 2005 (UTC)
  • Comment (a copy is also in the discussion for Paulo Ramos): I am not sure that CSD8 applies here. A copyright violation is when someone who is not the copyright owner tries to use a document outside of what is permitted by its copyright owner. In this case, the author of the article has implicitely authorized the Wikipedia to use the article (by placing it here). The problem is that the Wikipedia does not allow authors to retain all rights (articles must be released under the GNU doc license). I am not sure what happens in this case. I think that the first step is what Walter did, that is, warning the author. Paolo Liberatore (Talk) 23:39, 19 October 2005 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.