The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was keep. Johnleemk | Talk 06:51, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
Comment This doesn't read as a vanity article but it is hard to find the claim to notability for the academic. He has 137 citations on a Google Scholar search. I think that the article could be rewritten to demonstrate notability. (aeropagitica) 17:22, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
Weak keep -- Astrokey44|talk 04:24, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.