Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aneta Buena
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. WaltonOne 17:17, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Aneta Buena
Initially flagged for speedy deletion, I believe the subject does have some notability. While notability is not inherited (through her work with Ewa Sonnet and Ines Cudna, she has been prolific within her genre.)- h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 22:58, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete lacks news coverage Addhoc 22:59, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
- Comment. Most adult models that are notable enough for articles lack news coverage. Kerry Marie and Nadine Jansen lack news coverage; does that in itself mean we shouldn't have articles on them?--h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 16:53, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
- The answer to that is obviously yes. Valrith 19:37, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
- Feel free to nominate them for deletion then.-h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 19:39, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
- The answer to that is obviously yes. Valrith 19:37, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
- Comment. Most adult models that are notable enough for articles lack news coverage. Kerry Marie and Nadine Jansen lack news coverage; does that in itself mean we shouldn't have articles on them?--h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 16:53, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
- Comment. Should pass WP:PORNBIO criterion 3.-h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 23:15, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
-
- Where are the reliable sources? Addhoc 23:26, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
- Comment. She does seem to straddle the boundaries between big-bust and BBW, and thus may be notable for starting a new trend, but I'm having trouble finding WP:RS to support that.-h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h
- Speedy Delete. No coverage in reliable sources. Very litle work done in the pornography world and none of it notable. Fails all criteria for notability in either WP:BIO or WP:PORNBIO. Valrith 19:21, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
- Comment for closing admin: Not sure what is usually done about it, but it was a violation of procedure for the author of this article to remove the {{db-bio}} speedy tag that was placed on it...
- Comment. I removed it per WP:IAR, which is helping to improve the encyclopedia because I thought there was a serious chance of notability.-h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 19:41, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
- Comment for closing admin: Not sure what is usually done about it, but it was a violation of procedure for the author of this article to remove the {{db-bio}} speedy tag that was placed on it...
- Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. Tabercil 00:31, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poland-related deletions. -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk 17:52, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. The article doesn't currently pass WP:PORNBIO. Epbr123 19:05, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- Keep as per association with the other notable Polish models Ines Cudna and Ewa Sonnet with whom she co-starred in countless videos including notable Polish site Busty. Soft porn, less pretentious than that of Playboy or Penthouse. greg park avenue 00:44, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
- Comment: neither personal associations nor number of films/videos is a criterion for establishing notability. Valrith 20:46, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
- Comment: I don't want to sound sarcastic but for someone with Spanish good looks like Aneta it would be even harder to make it to feature the Playboy's cover girl, in which a magazine I never saw one like that, just the department store model types with proper sizes and too "made up". But they , the Playboy, make this policy, so be it. I still vouch for Aneta, just to be on a save side and not to discriminate anybody who doesn't fit into that commercial stereotype. Just one question. Why the other gals could be there (in Wikipedia) while Aneta could be not? One more notice. If we set the same rules for Hollywood stars as Playboy does for its models, than half of them stars with big bust or with Spanish features similar to Bo Derek or to Katy Jurado, who walked once the Sunset Boulevard should be made expelled out of town and from the Wikipedia too? greg park avenue 16:15, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
- Comment: neither personal associations nor number of films/videos is a criterion for establishing notability. Valrith 20:46, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
