Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrzej Tyszko

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — Scientizzle 16:02, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Andrzej Tyszko

Andrzej Tyszko (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Fails WP:RS, WP:V & WP:BLP – no reliable & verifiable references. Visor (talk) 07:03, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions. —Visor (talk) 07:04, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete-Wikipedia has very strict rules on biographies of living persons and this article does not adhere to those rules. On that note, it does not cite reliable sources and this makes its verifiability questionable. Also take note that the article is rather biased: "...form of exceptionally beautiful and profound portraits of outstanding Polish...". Cheers, Zacharycrimsonwolf 08:23, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete per failing WP:BLP Gwguffey (talk) 14:44, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletions. – David Eppstein (talk) 15:28, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete doesn't seem notable as either artist or photographer. Terrible article as it stands, & no RS sourcing. Johnbod (talk) 16:05, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete what about granting any graphics such as an architectural or technical assemby/detail drawing or its author the entry into Wikipedia? Some people just do their job. The cover of a jazzmen's albums must also meet the Wikipedia basic requirements as an artistic entity acknowledged by independent and prestigious sources. Can't vet for Norwegian examples, but I always saw the cover of a Polish jazzman's albums between 1970 and 1989 as nothing but a grainy picture of the artist such as Hanna Banaszak with some print on it, must see this. greg park avenue (talk) 18:50, 28 March 2008 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.