Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew McQuillan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Johnleemk | Talk 05:18, 21 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Andrew McQuillan and Group Flight

Despite claims to notability, I have to wonder. Just searching for "Andrew McQuillan" doesn't turn this guy up in the first page of Google hits (of which there are only 600+ for all of the people in the world with that name). If you do a search for "Andrew McQuillan" "World Flight", you get three hits. The first is for http://flightsims.co.uk/news/news.php?id=274, which appears to be a simulation game? User:Zoe|^(talk) 01:25, 16 January 2006 (UTC)

• Delete Non-notable TigerShark 01:29, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
• Comment - the whole thing is a simulation game, yes? From what I gather from the two articles, they raise money by simulating a real-time flight around the world. So based on this, I don't see anything odd about the link [1] you provided. --PeruvianLlama^(spit) 01:30, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Wait until he's done something more noteworthy. Eurosong 02:57, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete All points considered, this page should not exist. I say delete.

• OK delete mine but dont delete Group Flight. I think it is unfair to delete details of an organisation raising money for charity. We raise vital funds for UK and European Childrens Charities. Andrew McQuillan
• Delete but being a nice about it as possible. Not deleting because I cannot imagine who would sit in an airbus for three days willingly, rather than just handing over the cash, but because it's not notable. As always, willing to change my mind if new evidence appears. - brenneman^(t)(c) 02:03, 20 January 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.