Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anait

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mailer Diablo 09:17, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Anait

Delete: badly written ("short, nice and powerful"), vague ("there are mysteries"), unsourced. Articles about the goddess Anait or the story Queen Anait might be useful, this isn't. Pseudomonas 16:59, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

• Weak Delete. What is said is notable if backed by verifiable sources. The article doesn't have them, so could be pure original research. Also note the artist's signature in the image. — Ambuj Saxena (talk) 05:38, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

 AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
 Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Mailer Diablo 21:52, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

• Speedy delete: This is absolutely not what Wikipedia is about. We are not a book of baby names, and we are not a guide to all possible onomastics. This is someone's vanity. I think the name "Geogre" is wonderful, and of American origin, and it means "delete this nonsense right away, without tears or second thoughts." Geogre 02:50, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
• Keep & Re-write If verified should be kept, then stubified and re-writtten, if it is just vanity then I have no objections to deletion. -- Librarianofages 02:55, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per Geogre.--Peta 03:49, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete fails WP:V WilyD 13:07, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as per nom. Dlyons493 Talk 13:27, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Ekajati 13:59, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above--Jmatt1122 15:42, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. --Bigtop (tk|cb|em|ea) 17:32, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Maybe this just passes WP:DUMB, but that's about all. Moreschi 19:31, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above Bucketsofg✐ 23:32, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.