Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amayami

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was speedy delete, as per below, fails multiple CSD criteria. —Cuiviénen 16:14, 18 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Amayami

Entire content simply says that this doesn't exist. Need I say more? Grutness...wha? 00:01, 18 June 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete, non-notable character created by fans that doesn't actually appear in the series, only 352 Google results--☆TBC☆ (aka Tree Biting Conspiracy) 01:06, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per both. AdamBiswanger1 01:35, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete if it doesn't exist I'm sure it won't mind us eradicating all presence of its non-existence. Jammo (SM247) 01:39, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Speedy Delete per A1/3/7. Danny Lilithborne 02:19, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete as non-notable fancruft. At best. Ted (Talk) 03:09, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Speedy deleteas per (humorous) nom.
  • Speedy delete, fails CSD:A1, CSD:A3, and CSD:A7. Also fails WP:NFT. --Coredesat 05:45, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - two sentence anti-article.--Nydas 08:17, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Speedy delete as no content. --Xyrael T 10:03, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Speedy delete as no content and n-n. Inner Earth 10:17, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete, little or no meaningful content. "Does not exists", "invented in fanfics". Two reasons for deletion from the article itself. - Motor (talk) 11:50, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Weak Keep, the content you are all discussing here was changed by someone else than the original author to say "doesn't exist", so you shouldn't be using it as an argument, so please check the history, maybe a and merge with something would be better. Ask the author first, and tell him that he should not be making zillions of small articles, but rather one large. ackoz 13:26, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment, the original version of this page would have had a "db-nocontext" speedy tag from me. - Motor (talk) 13:47, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment - whether the article says they don't exist or not, fanfiction characters don't belong on Wikipedia, period. See WP:NFT. --Coredesat 15:41, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.