Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amanda Wenk

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

looks like wikipedia is run by a bunch of jealous fat girls...

The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 00:04, 22 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Amanda_Wenk

Reason why the page should be kept:

• Sexy Cannot Die*
• Keep This is absolutely legit. It's a known, established internet phenomenon. My only guess is that mod's are jealous...
• Keep !!!!! this is no trivial matter people!!!!!!!!!!!!1
• KeepIt's documentation of an Internet Meme of late 2005/ early 2006. Deleting the page won't make that fact go away. (This anonymous comment added from IP address) -- 70.24.118.158
• KeepI see no reason to delete this. It's 100% credible and indeed documents a real, if not terribly widely known, Internet phenomenon. It's perhaps the first interesting issue raised from public personal photography sites such as webshots, and I could easily see this phenomenon repeating itself. If it does, Wenk will be counted among the first to generate unintentional popularity in this way (by user 24.211.155.113).
• KeepA bunch of jealous fat girls... haha - Why would you delete what is obviosuly a phenom? (This anonymous comment added from IP address) -- 70.24.118.158
• Keep THis thing gets a ton of attention, it's a legitimate internet phenom

Reason why the page should be deleted Hypergeometric2F1[a,b,c,x] 08:21, 16 January 2006 (UTC)

• Delete Idiosyncratic, lack of importance --Hypergeometric2F1[a,b,c,x] 08:21, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, nn, vanity Jawz 08:58, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. It's not vanity, as Wenk has nothing to do with it -- and would seemingly would've preferred to remain anonymous -- but this is a person who's 15 seconds of fame are up. -- GWO 11:55, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per GWO. 15 seconds is not enough anyway. Kusma (討論) 14:47, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as per nom. --King of All the Franks 14:48, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete The subject makes no claims as to notability and appears to have made attempts to remove her Internet presence.  (aeropagitica)  15:49, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. DaGizza^{Chat (c)} 21:40, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, nn, vanity Incognito 03:35, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as non-encyclopedic. DrKC9N 06:07, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, todos putos.  :) Can't sleep, clown will eat me 09:32, 17 January 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.