Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amajada

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 11:12, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Amajada

Amajada (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

There appears to be no references findable for this creature. The article fails WP:ATT. PROD was removed without any improvement. Whpq 19:38, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

• Delete - This seems to be something made up one day. Smmurphy^(Talk) 20:20, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

• This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 13:10, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

• Delete; nonsense --Mhking 15:47, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
• Strong delete Looks like a joke to me. Acalamari 18:16, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy delete per WP:NFT. Bobanny 20:12, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy delete which is something I rarely say.DGG 08:19, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy delete, in fact, I did so, then undeleted because I'm not sure you can speedily delete articles if the PROD has been contested... oh well, if someone else tags it for speedy, no problems. – Riana ^ঋ 10:42, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.