Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alma Saraci (2nd nomination)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. If the article appears again without significant changes/sourcing/assertions of notability, it can be G4. Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 17:34, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Alma Saraci
This was previously deleted at AfD and then recreated a week later. It looks like there has been enough change since the first deletion that CSD G4 doesn't apply, so I am bringing it back to AfD. She is still a non-notable actress. The only film that she has appeared in that has been released went straight to video. BlueAzure (talk) 01:22, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
-
- Her IMDB page lists four released titles. Which of these is the 'only' one to which you refer?! --BrucePodger (talk) 13:25, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and actresses-related deletion discussions. —BlueAzure (talk) 01:32, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
Her movies will come out this year, and she is in the movie Karma, there is a wikipedia page about the movie. This movie has been in the news in Asia. She is notable actress. She has thousands of hits on google and does have other credited movies on IMDB. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Stugeguy (talk • contribs) 01:44, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. not a notable person Wiki-nightmare (talk) 02:12, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
- Keep Has been noted by other sources, for example her IMDB page referenced in the article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by BrucePodger (talk • contribs) 13:20, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
- Delete: IMDB must have an article on every actress who has appeared in a single credit to a single film: that's their job. On the other hand, an actress who walks across the frame once on a film that is not seen (and that's 666: Beast) is not of a high enough profile for an encyclopedia article. Further, the article is a personal homage to her yoga and beauty, and neither an article about an actor nor a biography of a person. Utgard Loki (talk) 15:28, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
First of all, its not a homage to her yoga and beauty. Second, the movie has come out and she has a source of fans since reviews HAVE been written. If you take your time and read the reviews you know that she actually is known. And maybe the actress does not want her biography shown since, if you did your homework, it got hacked and was altered. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Stugeguy (talk • contribs) 00:48, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
- Strong Delete This actress is not notable enough to have a page at this time. Canyouhearmenow 03:49, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
