Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alex school rankings

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Sango123 15:06, 17 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Alex school rankings

Delete as original research. mtz206 (talk) 01:26, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

• Delete as original research. It isn't even cool or interesting. Ted 01:42, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete I can't find any sources. --Starionwolf 01:51, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. Definitely original research. Delta 01:52, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete WP:OR, maybe WP:NFT, name suggests it's a bad knockoff of Alexa Internet rankings. BryanG^(talk) 01:59, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
• Pretty ingenious, although it doesn't clarify whether the seats have to be filled or not (UC Berkeley, I'm looking at you). Delete for WP:NFT and all the others. ~ trialsanderrors 02:10, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:OR, WP:NFT, and WP:HOAX. No google results [1]--☆TBC☆ (aka Tree Biting Conspiracy) 02:21, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
  • CommentI hope the changes address your concerns. In addition stating the article as a Hoax is somewhat ridiculous. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Foxtrotalpha (talk • contribs)
    • Comment, seems to be a hoax as there are no google results [2] to show that its an actual ranking method.--☆TBC☆ (aka Tree Biting Conspiracy) 03:42, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, fails WP:OR. --Coredesat 04:31, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, OR and an Alex ranking of 0 (0 seats / 9 faculty). Jammo (SM247) 05:20, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, original research. Also, it doesn't even make sense. Spirit-oriented is not necessarily the opposite of academic-oriented. --דניאל - Dantheman531 06:41, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. —Khoikhoi 20:07, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. It's entirely useless and original research. Grandmasterka 06:37, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Virtually everything is original research.--Auger Martel 11:53, 17 June 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.