Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ahmed Hulusi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 08:43, 5 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Ahmed Hulusi

Not quite a Speedy Delete, does assert some notabiliy  J\/\/estbrook   Talk  VSCA    23:45, 30 December 2005 (UTC)

• First of all, Merrium-Webster has no definition for "phylosophy" so I don't even know what it is, but possibly the editor meant "philosophy" and is not a proficient English speaker. So, if that is what was meant, then the article needs a spelling correction, but if the editor really meant "phylosophy" then the term needs a definition. GestaltG 17:19, 31 December 2005 (UTC)

• Delete as a copyright violation. The Wikientry is entirely copied and pasted from the "About the Authors" section of website linked in the article. This makes it not only a copyright violition but a vanity article as well. When you go to the website, it's nothing but an advertizement for books, with little substantial text. So this article could also be deleted as a promotional for the website. There are at least three valid reasons to delete this entry. Fortunately, a search of Wikipedia shows that there is no article currently for the other author on the page, Ahmed Baki. GestaltG 17:29, 31 December 2005 (UTC)

In the spirit of fairness, Google does come up with 1,780 hits for this person's name, but as stated on other Afd debates, that in itself it not criteria for otherwise unsubstantiated notability. GestaltG 17:29, 31 December 2005 (UTC)

• Delete as apparently non-notable. Unfortunately it's too late to speedy as a copyvio. Stifle 13:35, 3 January 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.