Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Agendist

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Carioca 20:14, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Agendist

Agendist (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

This seems to be a neologism in the blogosphere. No notable coverage or usage of it. The similar "agendism" was axed in this afd.MrMurph101 19:04, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

• A google cache as a source? Um, no. delete. Artw 22:35, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 04:26, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - a neologism / dicdef -- Whpq 16:36, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
• Delete as it does not deserve to have a separate article on WP. -- Niaz^{(Talk • Contribs)} 07:55, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.