Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aftervote

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

[edit] Aftervote

The result was speedy delete per criterion G7. Harryboyles 14:08, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

Aftervote (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Article is about a search engine provider. No assertion of notability that meets the standards of notability in either WP:CORP or WP:WEB. Article's author removed {{prod}}. Neil916 (Talk) 08:52, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete unless proper sources can be added to prove notability. —Ocatecir Talk 08:53, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. Spam. -- RHaworth 09:25, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Spam, no notability, no independent references. --Tractorkingsfan 10:13, 9 April 2007 (UTC)--Tractorkingsfan 10:13, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep I dont understand how its "spam" to create a wikipedia article for a search engine. Are you doubting that the search engine exists? Are you doubting that its based in a area? Please explain what it is you have a problem with so I can satisfy your issues, before writing something off as spam. Also, I will mention that creating a wikipedia article serves no 'spam' benefit- Also- If this is considered spam, Why are the entrys for engines such as chacha and wink allowed? I am all for providing you with whatever information you need to satisfy your needs. Bostondan2 11:54, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. Much of this is admitted copyright violation ("The following is taken from the AfterVote 'About' Page:...). As for the rest, too young to have garnered any notice, it appears. Unnotable. Herostratus 12:07, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Fuck it. Wikipedia is turning into the dmoz. Bostondan2 12:09, 9 April 2007 (UTC) and done.
  • Speedy delete Page blanked by author. Maxamegalon2000 13:17, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.