Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adelbrecht
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. AfD is not cleanup, and so any COI/POV issues can be (and apparently have been) handled through the standard editing process. --jonny-mt 02:46, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Adelbrecht
No sign of any notability of this "robot" project, which article even admits, failed. WP:Conflict of Interest - robot creator Marpsan, is the sole contributor and he has made no other contributions to WP. Most of article is a personal essay by Marspan. Camillus (talk) 22:15, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
- Delete per nom Iamblessed (talk) 22:22, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
- Keep. It doesn't matter if the project failed; it's still notable per the sources that I just added to the article. Any parts of the article which are a "personal essay" can be removed by editing. Phil Bridger (talk) 21:09, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
- Delete - late additions notwithstanding, there are serious COI problems here; it reads like an advertisement; some of article written in first person (major problem here!); primary author is a single purpose account. B.Wind (talk) 05:17, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
- Comment. I have removed the "personal essay" which is a potential copyvio (unless we have proof that User:Marspan is actually Martin Spanjaard) and can be found in one of the references, and we are still left with a valid stub article about a subject whose notability is established by reliable sources. Phil Bridger (talk) 10:20, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mister Senseless™ (Speak - Contributions) 23:29, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

