Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam Yoshida

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE. Golbez 07:15, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Adam Yoshida

• Delete vanity. Revolución 19:42, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete vanity. You 19:46, Jun 11, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete vanity. JamesBurns 05:33, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Comment: Do all the 28,000 Google hits on "Adam Yoshida" concern this person? Is that normal for a blogger? Uppland 09:56, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete vanity. No, all the 28,000 google hits do not pertain to the blogger, many are just random people online who share the same name. "Adam Yoshida"+ultra-conservative nets less than 200 results. Furthermore, nearly all of the results that do pertain to this man originate either on his own blog, or on "DoucheBlog" which is some sort of website that criticizes him. Not notable. -CunningLinguist 12:26, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• I have to disagree and vote Keep. Adam Yoshida is quite notable in the blogosphere (and on Usenet). I had heard of him long before this article was created. Firebug 03:16, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • By the way, I can assure you that if Yoshida himself had actually written this article, it would have been nowhere near this sober. Firebug 03:18, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• STRONG KEEP [I believe that deleting this article would constitute censorship of valid viewpoints]. STORM LEGION666 15:47, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC) — (The text in brackets was originally written by Newkidd and has been refactored by android per WP:RPA.)
  • Welcome to Wikipedia, STORM LEGION666. I've noticed that, with you're newly created user account, you've already managed to cast votes much like this one in seven vfd's (although you've done nothing else). -- BD2412 ^talk 16:23, 2005 Jun 14 (UTC)

I have reported this user for Vandalism in progress. Please remove this paragraph when problem solved. -Snorre/Antwelm 16:38, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)

• Delete, by the way. Vanity. -- BD2412 ^talk 16:23, 2005 Jun 14 (UTC)
• Delete nonnotable.mikka (t) 16:34, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Non-notable. Quale 19:59, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.