Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam Williss
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. W.marsh 17:36, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Adam Williss
Delete due to lack of WP:RS indicating that this individual meets WP:BIO. The organization of which he is a member may be notable, but being a state delegate to that party does not confer notability. The webzine of which he is the publisher has previously been deleted. Many of the external links are profile pages, primary sources, and so on, and I am hard pressed to find any on my own, but I am willing to reconsider if reliable sources are provided. --Kinu t/c 18:54, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
- I agree, delete unless notability is sourced. Trebor 21:53, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. Kavadi carrier 00:42, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
- I nominated his club World Ving Tsun Athletic Association for speedy and prod. If those get struck down, please consider adding that article to this nomination. Kavadi carrier 00:46, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
- Delete Article fails to assert notability. Caknuck 05:58, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
- Keep This individual is involved in several current events within the Wing Chun community including the Wing Chun Foundation, California Wing Chun Association, Wing Chun Teahouse and the World Ving Tsun Athletic Association. Although the individual's ezine may have been deleted, we should consider its re-inclusion due to it being the only ezine available for the Wing Chun community as a whole. In addition to state rep, the individual is also the Director of Public Relations for the World Ving Tsun Athletic Association. Please review the individual's external links. Dai Bak Lung 02:22, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Localzuk(talk) 21:25, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

