Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam Shaheen

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. I added a few simple references myself after a few seconds on Google, and I'm sure more can be had. Kafziel Talk 14:27, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Adam Shaheen

Adam Shaheen (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Lack of notability, references and updates. Ozgod 03:33, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

  • Weak delete... you have something against people called "Adam" today? :) – Qxz 04:11, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
    • Comment Most Bio's fail WP:BIO for notibility. Looks like he is starting from A, could be a loooong list.--Dacium 04:28, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Weak keep He's produced some notable shows and is president of a notable studio. Just tag with {{unref}} or at the most merge. John Reaves (talk) 06:05, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep, presidents of notable studios are notable themselves and a lack of sources can be remedied. I see no valid reason for deletion. - Mgm|(talk) 12:57, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete unless sourced and referenced by end of this AfD. We are dealing with a living person and therefore all assertions must be proven Alf photoman 16:19, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per Alf photoman comment. PigmanTalk to me 19:58, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
  • weak keep I see no reason why sources will not be found. Did the nom try?DGG 23:36, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep and expand. President of Cuppa Coffee Studio makes him the Steven Spielberg of the rugrat set. —xanderer Flag of the United States 00:17, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per Alf photoman unless sourced by end of AFD. *Exeunt* Ganymead | Dialogue? 20:20, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.