Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam Rin
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. --Coredesat 20:47, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Adam Rin
The article was created by user User:Afbcasejr, who claims to be a business partner of a person described. I think it is inappropriate to write bios of your business partners, and especially because the article looks like promotion for both person described (Adam Rin) and article author (Albert F. Case, Jr). Futurix 02:41, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, not notable. Akihabara 03:12, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom WP:BIO and WP:COI probable. SkierRMH,09:15, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete Bec-Thorn-Berry 11:33, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per above. Jefferson Anderson 17:50, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
- Deleteper nom. Davidpdx 09:10, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
This is AFBCaseJr responding. 1. I removed all but one reference to myself. 2. If nobody else has written about Dr. Rin, why not his business partner? He was the inventor of the first 4th generation programming language (IDEAL) and a pioneer on the scale of Peter Chen and James Martin as it relates to data modeling. Is there some rule that only people who don't know you can write about you????? 3. If anyone questions the early and significant contributions of Dr. Rin, then check the references that I added to the article, including Marty Goetz's citation of him (Marty was founder of ADR, the fist relational DB company, later acquired by CA). 4. What EXACTLY does it look like the article is promoting? Neither he nor I are "for hire" as consultants, as we are 100% committed to our current project. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.187.109.150 (talk • contribs)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
