Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Acceleo
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. —Wknight94 (talk) 05:17, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Acceleo
Reads like an advertisement. I don't think it's a notable or well-known enough product to warrant an encyclopedia article. 743 Ghits for acceleo code generator -wikipedia, mostly canned text from download sites; 21700 with "wikipedia". Looks like we're unintentionally giving its reputation quite a boost. Quuxplusone 21:15, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete (nominator's vote). Note that "but it's open-source!" is not a reason to keep the article. --Quuxplusone 21:15, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete, advert, etc. Stifle (talk) 20:50, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete as per nominator. I stumbled across this page as I was looking for a different company called "Obeo". McKay 19:36, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete unless sourced. Addhoc 15:03, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
- I am sorry but I would have to disagree with you on some points :
- First, When I make the search you pointed out on google (acceleo code generator -wikipedia), I get 10700 results which is not bad. Acceleo is a young opensource code generator (April 2006) but is now quite well known and has a good community of users. Now we do have more related links in french as the project was initially french.
- I do agree that beeing an opensource software is not a reason to keep an article, but there is nothing commercial in the article, it is explaining what the features are
- Obeo is the company that has started the project so Acceleo and Obeo are related
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
