Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Acccn

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Titoxd^(?!?) 05:31, 29 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Acccn

Delete as advertising or vanity? What would Jesus do? Eddie.willers 03:37, 21 October 2005 (UTC)

• Delete. The debate might be in the air about if churches are noteworthy enough for individual pages, but I'm throwing my vote in because of the advertising.  freshgavinΓΛĿЌ  05:14, 21 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete - agree with Freshgavin. Noteworthy churches only please. --MacRusgail 10:11, 21 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. - I could see an article on a church of historic significance, architectural distinction, or any number of other elements of notability, but this one doesn't cut it. -- Mwanner | Talk 18:38, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete NN --Rogerd 03:22, 24 October 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.