Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abomination (Dungeons & Dragons)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge per BOZ.  Sandstein  06:34, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Abomination (Dungeons & Dragons)

Abomination (Dungeons & Dragons) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Doesn't appear to be a notable aspect of D&D. Only sources seem to be a fansite; article is written in-universe. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 03:08, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. Merge per User:BOZ. Debate (talk) 06:42, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
• Delete, has no reliable sources. Blast Ulna (talk) 07:16, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
• Merge into List of Dungeons & Dragons 3.0 edition monsters#WTC 88169 - Epic Level Handbook (2002). I will add the proper source to that page later today to provide a proper destination on the page. We have been involved in merging many D&D monster article pages into these lists. For an example of how this has been previously handled, see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Athach. BOZ (talk) 12:23, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
• Merge - but note that even in the context of the game, the definition is not widely recognised (since Epic level play is a minority interest); 'Abomination' is at least as likely to suggest the larger and more dangerous Yuan-Ti as these things (which are a grab-bag from several mythologies and none). AlexTiefling (talk) 14:21, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
• Delete. 69.140.152.55 (talk) 01:28, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.