Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A.I.B.A.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. – Robert ^{T | @ | C} 00:18, 30 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] A.I.B.A.

Non-notable and an advertisement. eCourier (that article, written by the same person, also contains blatant bias) is a marginal start-up company, and its delivery mechanism surely does not warrant its own article. Google test returns no relevant hits for AIBA or A.I.B.A. The article claims that the algorithm was created in part by MIT, but I could find no evidence of this fact. -D. Wu 16:42, 24 November 2005 (UTC)

• delete per nom. I do get a few hits when googling[1], but nothing that says to me that is notable. -- AJR | Talk 23:17, 24 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete — advertizing/PR-speak. — RJH 01:12, 27 November 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.