Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/8th Birmingham Boys' Brigade

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:36, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] 8th Birmingham Boys' Brigade

The article is not notable and appears to be a vanity article. I'd also propose deleting all the associated images. Alabamaboy 14:49, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. --Alabamaboy 14:50, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
• Merge any notable content to Boys' Brigade and delete. Kafziel 14:57, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Nothing of importance to be seen here. Dr Zak 16:11, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per AfD at Brandon High School JROTC - individual units of a greater youth entity like the various scout, guide, cadet or nippers organisations are not likely to be notable, and this is the case here. SM247 23:28, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Like Scout Troops, a BB Company has to be very notable to have an article, such as oldest or largest in the country. This is not notable enough. However, why delete images. They might be usefull (not all - some) on Boys' Brigade, where there are no photographs at present, or other BB articles. Leave images, merge part of article including 1 or 2 images to Boys' Brigade, and delete. --Bduke 23:31, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

I'd be ok with merging the images into Boys' Brigade. The problem is that none of the images have any source info with them. If the editor who uploaded the images corrects this, then the best of th eimages can be kept.--Alabamaboy 23:59, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.