Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/3WA

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. I'll leave redirecting to someone else. —Wknight94 (talk) 13:01, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] 3WA

3WA (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) - (View log)

Vanity. Unverifiable. Non-notable. Advertising. And I think the "airs on E!" bit is BS. There's no such show on E!. So, add suspected hoax to the list. Keith D. Tyler ¶ (AMA) 18:05, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletions. -- SkierRMH 18:10, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy delete as spam for a nn company; "3WA wrestling" has 2,410 Ghits. Redirect per Michaelas10--Ioannes Pragensis 19:56, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
• Redirect to World Wide Wrestling Alliance. An alternative name indicated by Google results and the article itself. Michaelas10 (Talk) 21:41, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

That may sound plausible, but they clearly refer to different incarnations of such a group. Compare also the 3WA website with the WWWA website. - Keith D. Tyler ¶ (AMA) 06:36, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

OK then nominate WWWA for deletion, too.--Ioannes Pragensis 09:32, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

Actually according to the WWWA article there are two different organisations fighting over the name, neither of which is this one so that makes 3 in total. Delete this 3WA, unverifiable, probable hoax. One Night In Hackney 03:06, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

• Delete per above... Addhoc 14:51, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.