Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2348

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was redirect to 24th century. Titoxd(?!? - help us) 01:33, 18 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] 2348

This article might be notable one day, but are we setting precedents to create articles for every year to come? -- Longhair 10:34, 13 January 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete -- Longhair 10:34, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete until we get there. -- Saberwyn - The Zoids Expansion Project 10:57, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
    • Redirect per below and to discourage re-creation
  • Delete. The only piece of information is that Gain_Ground references the year, and that information is already there. In fact I bet someone saw a juicy redlink there to 2348 and decided to fill it... Years don't need linking, only full dates for date preferences. —Quarl (talk) 2006-01-13 11:06Z
    • Redirect per Astrokey44. Looks like almost all links to the 24th-century years are from Star Trek articles :) —Quarl (talk) 2006-01-13 20:44Z
  • Delete per nom. Quarl makes an interesting point. I wonder how many articles of this sort are created because someone saw a redlink that really shouldn't be. Maybe it'd be an idea to use "what links here" on AfD entries to find and fix these. Reyk 11:16, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. Robin Johnson 11:24, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. --Terence Ong Talk 15:17, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Redirect to 24th century which is where 2362 2363 and alot of others redirect to -- Astrokey44|talk 15:29, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Redirect as above. I'm not against future years having articles if there are notable predicted events or fictional connections, but a single video game reference doesn't really cut it. 23skidoo 16:56, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.