Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2008 in music

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy keep under WP:SNOW given the nomination has been withdrawn and the article improved by User:Yellowdesk. Capitalistroadster 03:08, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] 2008 in music

2008 in music (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Chock to the brim with crystalballery and rumourmongering. Only 12 entries in the entire list are referenced. I don't honestly think that the article/list is worth saving in its present state. Currently, it only serves as a hoaxer/sneaky vandal magnet. Kurt Shaped Box 13:22, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

• Delete Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. This is jumping the gun by a long way. --Malcolmxl5 14:16, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
• Weak keep Needs to be re-written and sourced, but it's no different from films that are expected to be released next year (IE in just over 5 months time). Saying it's a vandal magnet doesn't hold water, otherwise we might as well close Wikipedia fullstop. Lugnuts 17:03, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per Malcolmxl5. - Cyborg Ninja 17:52, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
• Keep but delete all of the unsourced statements/listings, which I have just now done. -- Yellowdesk 18:02, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
• Keep Not sure about speculation, but let's just keep the article just in case a user wants to add a confirmed album (or something) by a band that could release a new album next year, although we still almost got five months before 2008 happens. Alex 18:44, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
• Keep as long as only sourced information is allowed. T Rex | talk 19:52, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
• Keep It's almost 2008 already. Golfcam 21:23, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
• Comment thanks to the efforts of the two editors today, the article is now in a much better and more manageable state (cheers guys!). May I withdraw my AFD nomination? --Kurt Shaped Box 21:54, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
• Keep Of course, only those which is confirmed and sourced should stay, which is the case right now. So I have no problem with this article.--JForget 23:05, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.