Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2006 Smackdown Results

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete as fancruft. Of little encyclopedic value, more suited to a personal website/blog than WP. (aeropagitica) 20:49, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] 2006 Smackdown Results

No context, very little usable information Martin Hinks 18:00, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

• weak keep. The context is Smackdown. The original author abandoned this trivia article, but it does require heavy cleanup. I will link it into several Smackdown articles, and if it will not improve during the vote, I will change my opinion to delete . `'mikka (t) 18:29, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as fancruft, monthly TNA iMPACT! result pages were deleted for the same reason. TJ Spyke 21:14, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per TJ Spyke. --Oakster ^(Talk) 07:07, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per TJ Spyke-- bd (talk to me) (watch me) 23:48, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per TJ Spyke. JPG-GR 07:18, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per SilentJay. -- ^(Talk)I will work on this artical so that it won't have to be delteted. I have most of the Results on my comp 18:37, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, per nom. No value, can quickly get out of hand (how long has Smackdown been on the air? And do we do this for "Raw" and all of the other wrestling shows, too?) and of no scholarly value. - WarriorScribe 17:40, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.