Wikipedia:Articles for creation/2008-02-05
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| All article submissions on this archive page have now been evaluated. For more unreviewed requests, see Unreviewed articles for creation request pages. |
Please now follow the link back to Wikipedia:Articles for creation.
-
-
- Submitters: Please do not remove other submissions from this page. This page is a collection of many people's submissions.
- Reviewers: Please check yesterday's submissions as well as looking at today's, and also check the backlog of unreviewed articles from all prior days.
-
[edit] chase car
| This is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it. |
[edit] Nervonic Acid
| This is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it. |
[edit] Brett Crawford
| This is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it. |
[edit] R.K. Karanjia
| This is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it. |
[edit] Canyon Effect
| This is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it. |
[edit] Μάριος Καρογιάν
| This is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it. |
[edit] Windows 8
| Infobox OS version
]]}}
In the Windows 8,there is going to be complete overhaul of User Interface. New UX (User Experience) is being developed for the Windows 8. According to some sources, the Windows 8 will be totally explorer less. One focus that Microsoft has slated for Windows 8 in particular (yes, skipping right over mention of Windows 7) is a total revamp of WTT (Windows Test Technologies), which are the technologies leveraged to test Windows. The WTT team “is looking to make significant changes to it’s infrastructure for Windows 8. We want to address all the major problems [testers and test managers] have faced over the last few years by developing a truly scalable and reliable testing infrastructure.” The current projected timeframe for the WTT architecture and UI overhaul is 18 months. The project manager of Microsoft said, “We will also be on the forefront for what and how we plan for Windows 8.”
|
|
| This is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it. |
[edit] Aap Kaa Surroor 2: Ay Himesh Bhai!
| Infobox Film
]]}} Aap Kaa Surroor 2: Ay Himesh Bhai! is an Indian Bollywood film directed by Prashant Chadha is going to release sometime in 2008. This film is going to be the sequel of the blockbuster film Aap Kaa Surroor - The Real Luv Story. In this film,Himesh Reshammiya will be seen in two different styles i.e. with cap and without cap . |
|
| This is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it. |
[edit] Hayesbokas
| This is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it. |
[edit] Reija Hirvikoski
| This is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it. |
[edit] Designer Reija Hirvikoski
| This is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it. |
[edit] Reija Hirvikoski
| This is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it. |
[edit] Designer Reija Hirvikoski
| This is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it. |
[edit] Dimensional Markup Language (DML)
| This is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it. |
[edit] LFG Gnomer
| This is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it. |
[edit] Andreas D Johansen
| This is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it. |
[edit] ELAMARAM KAREEM
| This is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it. |
[edit] Shorty
| This is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it. |
[edit] DOORLEY, Tom
| This is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it. |
[edit] Schneider v. Rusk, 377 U.S. 163 (1964)
| Prior=APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. | Subsequent=None | Holding=A naturalized US citizen has the right to return to their native country, and in de facto resume there former citizenship, has the right to remain a US citizen, even if they never return to the United States. | SCOTUS=1 | Majority= | LawsApplied=U.S. Const. amend. I
Schneider v. Rusk, 377 U.S. 163 (1964) Angelika Schneider was born in Germany. She came to the US with her parents and became a US citizen upon their naturalization at age 16. When she graduated from college, she moved back to here native country Germany. The State Department claimed Schneider had lost her US citizenship in accordance with a section of the Immigration and Nationality Act which revoked the citizenship of any naturalized citizen who returned to his or her country of birth and remained there for at least three years. The Supreme Court held that since no provision of the law stripped natural-born Americans of their citizenship as a result of extended or permanent residence abroad, it was unconstitutionally discriminatory to apply such a rule only to naturalized citizens. [edit] Sources<http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=US&vol=377&invol=163 http://www.aca.ch/hisuscit.htm http://www.richw.org/dualcit/cases.html http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/historics/USSC_CR_0377_0163_ZD.html http://www.enotes.com/american-court-cases/schneider-v-rusk
|
||||
| This is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it. |
[edit] iPod OS
| This is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it. |

