Talk:Art Students League of New York

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article or section seems to contain embedded lists that may require cleanup. To meet Wikipedia's style guidelines, please help improve this article by: removing items which are not notable, encyclopedic, or helpful from the list(s); incorporating appropriate items into the main body of the article; and discussing this issue on the talk page.

	It is requested that a photograph or photographs be included in this article to improve its quality. Wikipedians in building photography may be able to help!
	The Free Image Search Tool (FIST) may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

How about a photo of the exterior of the building or a studio / class for illustration purposes? --Shorn again (talk) 23:32, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] copyvio

Only the part below the copy violation notice and before the links looks like a violation. Sparkit 15:07, 8 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Question re names of teachers and alumni

Are these names in any sort of order?Freiherrin (talk) 06:36, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

It might not be in keeping with the character of the League if the list was organized in any sort of order. Malcolm Schosha (talk) 21:50, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

I have removed the direct external links to faculty/alumni web sites, as these sites are already properly included in the separate articles for each artist and don't need to be linked again here. Additionally, I integrated the alumni/faculty names that had been listed under "See also" into the general list - there does not appear to be any rationale to separate out these few names. --Shorn again (talk) 00:14, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

I have reverted the recent edit by Modernist, which appears from its terse summary "rv nn" to have removed Alan Brookman Beddoe from the list of alums as not notable. As he has his own article and sources are cited there, there does not seem to be a rationale for deletion. Modernist, what would the reasoning be? So long as his article is here, this deletion does not appear defensible. If you in good faith feel he is not notable, wouldn't the proper way to begin be a discussion at that page? Shorn again (talk) 21:41, 6 June 2008 (UTC)