Talk:Arqiva

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of the Business and Economics WikiProject.
Stub rated as stub-Class on the assessment scale
??? This article has not yet received an importance rating on the assessment scale.

[edit] Notable and non-notable transmitting stations

This applies to the National Grid Wireless article too, so please see my comment in Category talk:UK transmitter sites. Harumphy 15:16, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

This is your POV, isn't it? ••Briantist•• talk 07:00, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
WP:9W WP:PAPER WP:NOT#CENSOR ••Briantist•• talk
Can we please keep this discussion in Category talk:UK transmitter sites? That way, we don't have to do everything twice in Talk:Arqiva and Talk:National Grid Wireless. TIA. Harumphy 08:30, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
No, that's not the Wikipedia way, is it? You seem to have your OWN RULES!!! ••Briantist•• talk 09:24, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
OK, you're a troll, and I'm wasting my time. Don't forget WP:3RR again on your way out. Harumphy 09:27, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
Oh look! A sock puppet! ••Briantist•• talk 09:56, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
I see you avoided WP:3RR by using a sock puppet. ••Briantist•• talk 09:57, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
If you mean 81.158.24.187, that's not me, and in any case I've just reverted that IP's edit! Harumphy 10:03, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
Seems a bit suspicious to me... ••Briantist•• talk 10:06, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Notable and non-notable transmitting stations

What is the criteria for being "Notable and non-notable"? ••Briantist•• talk 10:12, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

Criteria is in WP:NN. --KZTalkContribs 11:06, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
There was some discussion of this about three months ago, following a batch of AfD nominations. The consensus then was that, in relation to TV broadcast transmitters in the UK, main stations (about 4% of the total) are notable and relay stations (96%) are usually not. This discussion took place in Category talk:UK transmitter sites, as well as the AfD stuff. Harumphy 11:25, 11 April 2007 (UTC)