Talk:Army Air Corps (United Kingdom)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.
Additional information and associated task forces: This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status: Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar: not checked Supporting materials: not checked To fill out this checklist, please add the following to the template call: <!-- B-Class-1. It is suitably referenced, and all major points have appropriate inline citations. --> |B-Class-1=yes/no <!-- B-Class-2. It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain obvious omissions or inaccuracies. --> |B-Class-2=yes/no <!-- B-Class-3. It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content. --> |B-Class-3=yes/no <!-- B-Class-4. It is free from major grammatical errors. --> |B-Class-4=yes/no <!-- B-Class-5. It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams. --> |B-Class-5=yes/no Associated task forces (general topics): Military aviation task force Associated task forces (nations and regions): British military history task force

[edit] Sub-articles

I'm really not convinced that there is a huge amount of value in all the vairous sub-articles being created for individual units, until such time as they have enough material to be more than a stub. I'd suggest that independent flights and squadrons could be consolidated together in one.ALR 12:56, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Page rename

It has bothered me for a long time that this article was at Army Air Corps, when there is at least one other air arm which has used that name which is probably more notable internationally, the United States Army Air Corps of 1926-1942. In addition, the current US Army aviation assets are often called the "Army Air Corps", and there was a force dringing the Philippine Commenwealth that used the name too. As such, I have decided to Be Bold, and convert the plain title Army Air Corps to a disambiguation page. The title I have chosen for this page, British Army Air Corps, may not bes the best one, but it was all I could think of at the time. The Commonscat page is it "Category:Army Air Corps (UK)", so Army Air Corps (UK) would be a possible alternative. Until it's decided if this title will be the permanent one or not, I have only changed a few redirects. I'll try to finish that up in a few days if no has objected to the move , or if an alternate title has been chosen. Thanks. - BillCJ (talk) 23:10, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

How about we go for the standard UK disambiguator - thus Army Air Corps (United Kingdom)? Buckshot06 (talk) 22:54, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Works for me. I'm just surprised it went this long without comment tho. That's unusual for a UK-related topic - usually doesn't take two hours! - BillCJ (talk) 23:00, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Should I just go ahead and move the page, or do you think we need to wait for further comments? Buckshot06 (talk) 23:05, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Just go ahead. Two months without comment on the first move shows that move wasn't controversial, so I doubt anyone will contest this one. Of course, it might also mean British Army Air Corps was acceptable to everyone who saw it - without any comment, we can't tell. I was bold in moving it in the first place, so I can hardly argue against it this time (and I'm not). - BillCJ (talk) 23:17, 2 May 2008 (UTC)