User:Arjun01/Adminship

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Arjun has nominated these users

[edit] Arjun has offered to nominate the following users:

  • Anger22, not now he says :(
  • Michaelas10 not now, maybe in February-March 2007?

[edit] Arjun is watching these users carefully and may ask to nominate

Ongoing RfAs:

Username S O N S% Ending Duplicates? Report
Ironholds 0 0 0 0% 16 June 16:44 No Details
Tinkleheimer 15 15 8 50% 16 June 04:10 No Details
Epbr123 133 2 1 99% 11 June 17:21 No Details
Tanthalas39 72 6 2 92% 10 June 18:30 No Details

Last updated 17:00, 9 June 2008 (UTC) by Tangobot

[edit] Arjun's criteria

Here is my special little criteria I use when I judge a candidate for adminship, this is not a checklist as it is just natural to check for these things, the criteria is also not written in stone and can be given to exceptions.

  • RC patrol:Always a plus with me, it is not necessary but it greatly helps. As this is one of the duties that admins are generally expected to do.
  • Time: must be around for at least 3 months.
  • Wikispace:Must be rather high, Wikispace is vital, and must be involved in XFD's even if it is just once and a while. Admins can use the "delete" button, so they should understand the process of XFD's.
  • Featured?: Arjun does not judge a candidate badly if they have no Featured material, whether it be portals, articles, lists or pics. However it is always a grand plus. In a nutshell no 1FA criteria will be judged on you.
  • Civility: an absolute must, the candidate should be civil at all times. Admins go through a lot of #*%! which requires a civil outlook and must be calm and not let the vandals/trolls get under their skins.
  • User talk: must be a good total of edits, I prefer admins who interact with other users/admins. The candidate must not be afraid to ask questions.
  • Userpage: must be clean, and non-inflammatory, political views/religious views are okay, just as long as it is not to the extreme.
  • Email: would be a big plus if it is enabled, I would however never oppose if it isn't.
  • Wars: must not edit war, edit warring is counter productive and doesn't help wikipedia at all.