Template talk:Area
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This template looks very sqaushed and it practically illegible in firefox
- I have made an attempt to fix it. I did away with the E+30 and E+36 columns as they were unpopulated, and instead put E+41 in a row below with the explaining remark of "special areas". I tried hard to make "special areas" not bold, but have no idea how it is emboldened. Perhaps someone with a better knowledge of CSS (?) can help!?
- I was able to make "special areas" not bold. The row it was in was considered a header (it used ! at the beginning), so I switched it to a regular row (using a | at the beginning). I can't figure out the squashy-ness, but at least I figured out one thing. ~ Amalas rawr =^_^= 16:01, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
-
-
- Thanks, I already sorted the squashy-ness (compare it to this) as someone has removed a parameter they thought was superfluous, but was required in Mozilla.
-
[edit] Excessive width
Can something be done to reduce the width of this table? I think presentation-wise it doesn't look very professional to force horizontal scrolling
[edit] Ugly
This is perhaps the ugliest template I've ever run across on Wikipedia. Its creator deserves some sort of medal. Jimp 05:02, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
-
- hehe, I concur!
- I agree; it's still one of the ugliest and most useless templates I've seen, and your comment was 6 months ago. Gene Nygaard 19:08, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Width
How about having the table in multiply rows to reduce it from forcing it self over the page boarder eg:
| header 1 | header 2 | header 3 | header 4 |
|---|---|---|---|
| row 1, cell 1 | row 1, cell 2 | row 1, cell 3 | row 1, cell 4 |
| row 2, cell 1 | row 2, cell 2 | row 2, cell 3 | row 2, cell 4 |
This way you should be able to keep the same data but it will be in multiply rows (3 rows from my calculations for 4 cells per row) and it should stop it going over the page edge. Peachey88 (Talk Page | Contribs) 09:26, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
