Talk:Arctic Hare
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The picture is the same as the Snowshoe Hare.
Also, the size and weight for this hare seems to be off. 24 inches and 9-12 lbs is very large and heavy for hares in the parts of the world where this creature is supposed to inhabit.
- The snowshoe hare is different from the artic hare. Give us the source that you found the size of it at and I would be more than happy to change it. ILovePlankton 14:22, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
Is it OK to use imperial units like inch in the articles?? --78.56.1.8 (talk) 00:43, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
- Both should be used. Use {{convert}} for automatic conversions. - UtherSRG (talk) 13:11, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] what can i say
i want to say that this animal is white but yall keep refusing my entree —Preceding unsigned comment added by 123456zbra (talk • contribs) 23:11, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Captivity
There is no mention in this article of the captive breeding of arctic hares which has been more successful (though still failed to produce young that were successfully reintroduced to the wild) than attempts with all other hare species.--Zerothis (talk) 01:54, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

