Talk:Archipelago of San Andres, Providencia and Santa Catalina
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
History section seems too oriented to the Nicaraguan point of view as it only speaks on the history of the conflict omiting parts of the Colombian POV.
— Carlos Th (talk) 15:31, 4 August 2005 (UTC)
- The article is fair. Lets wait for the Hague to resolve the dispute between the two countries. - Gabriel Solorzano
-
- I've now added the English puritan settlers point-of-view! :-) Carcharoth 16:24, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] A INFOBOX DIFFERENCES A
I don't see any problem by using the country infobox, it just provides more material, since the department infobox looks a little "creepy", using the country infobox will also tel about the present situation in which the lands are disputed. I think it doesn't matter however.
201.218.69.252 21:56, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
San Andres is not a country! If you don't like the infobox design one yourself and then propose it at WP:COL. In case of approval you will also have to change the infoboxes in the other 31 departments of Colombia articles to keep the standard. --F3rn4nd0 (Roger - Out) 05:12, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
Well, I'll see what do I do. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.218.69.252 (talk) 21:19, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] New article in NY Times
Might be good for writing about the current political situation as well as the conflicting claims of Nicaragua and Columbia. See: here. --Bobak (talk) 15:03, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

