Talk:Ararat (film)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Films. This project is a central gathering of editors working to build comprehensive and detailed articles for film topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Start
This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.
Low
This article has been rated as Low-importance on the priority scale.
Ararat (film) is within the scope of WikiProject Armenia, an attempt to better improve and organize information in articles related or pertaining to Armenia and Armenians. If you would like to contribute or collaborate, you could edit the article attached to this page or visit the project page for further information.
Start This article has been rated as start-Class on the Project's quality scale.
WikiProject Turkey This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Turkey, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Turkey-related topics. Please visit the the participants page if you would like to get involved. Happy editing!
Start This article has been rated as start-Class on the project's quality scale.
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
edit · history · watch · refresh To-do list for Ararat (film):

No to-do list assigned; you can help us in improving the articles in the same category

[edit] Terrorist?

The Grey Wolves are terrorist? Oh, come on, we are talking about a legal party and it´s legal members....

Pamir 13:22, 18 September 2005 (UTC)

It's possible for a legal party to also double as a terrorist group. After all, Hamas is a legal party in the Palestinian authority and its a terrorist organization... -- Clevelander 11:58, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] P.L.U.C.K.

I think that the article should have something about the music, such as the song P.L.U.C.K., by System of a Down. Just a thought.Defy You 02:47, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Weasel Words

It's not enough to say that some people felt negatively about the movie for such and such a reason. The section needs references to actual people or sources of criticism. -- Augustgrahl 04:13, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

I also agree with what Augustgrahl said becuase it says the film was criticised without giving any reference to who criticised or why did they criticise the film. If it doesn't have a reference than that paragraph should be deleted. ROOB323 08:14, 10 April 2007 (UTC)