Talk:Antonines

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]

This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class by WikiProject Biography because it uses a stub template. If you agree with the assessment, please remove {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page. If you disagree with the assessment, please change it by editing the class parameter of the {{WPBiography}} template, removing {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page, and removing the stub template from the article.

[edit] Definition of the Antonines

The way that it has come to me in my readings of history that the "Antonines period" is defined by the form of Imperial succession; namely the practice of Roman Emperors adopting worthy, but unrelated, men (usually military commanders) as their successors, and not relying on the uncertainties of family and heredity. This started with Nerva, and ended with Marcus Aurelius.

The current structure of the article gives a reference (Gibbon) for this view, but none for the stated "two emperor" definition. Unless a reference for the "two emperor" view can be found, perhaps the article should be changed to the view of Gibbon and other historians. --Vedexent (talk) - 00:35, 12 August 2007 (UTC)

I was just about to post the same thing, I had always thought the Antonines were the group of emperors starting from Nerva and going on until Marcus Aurelius (whether Commodus is classed as one or not I'm not sure, because Commodus was Marcus Aurelius' son). I also thought the defining factor was the selection procedure. I know that J.M. Roberts' New Penguin History of the World refers to Nerva through to Marcus Aurelius as the "age of the Antonines". Blankfrackis (talk) 21:27, 22 November 2007 (UTC)