Talk:Anthony Parnes

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.

Biography Portal

Stub

This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]

when editing, it is always wise to lrn a ltl abt the subject 1st and nt rely on guesswork or sbjective impression. thanx. Jamaissur

Whole words would be appreciated. You're not text-messaging. SlimVirgin ^(talk) 16:29, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

Please put your source here. I have looked online but can't find one that is reputable. SlimVirgin ^(talk) 17:43, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

Also, please note that if you revert again, you will have violated 3RR. SlimVirgin ^(talk) 17:44, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

i wld lk an apology 4 yr deliberate harassment of me via yr wilful ignorance of the Guinness affair. anyone who knows anything abt it knws that the 'guinness 4' consisted of 3 mmbrs of the jewish-brit. cmnty (inc. parnes) and 1 man with a jewish father (ernest saunders). this is common knwlg amg businessppl, jewish and non-jewish alike and the observer stated it explicitly in the quote i used, wch u hv ignored. Jamaissur

f sfdjk fnm sdfk ddnd a beebe letgg mere adnfm adsn ne. asd, qasdn ene nl 4 smnna dna? mere wemnx swsin asiun s ankp nbgjsb asdnm! Jayjg ^(talk) 22:08, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

it's me who supposed to be on medication. if it's an iq test, i fail -- i'm distracted by the pain in my knuckles after a long walk. if it's meaningless, i gt the mssg. Jamaissur

The medication doesn't seem to interfere at all with your careful copy-editing of articles on infamous Holocaust deniers: [1] Nor does it seem to interfere when you copyedit the articles on, create re-directs for, and copyedit and add to List of British Jews yet another British Jew who has been convicted of crime, [2] [3] [4], which is apparently your only purpose for editing Wikipedia. No, the issue of communicating effectively in English only seems to manifest itself on Talk: pages; why is that, I wonder? Jayjg ^(talk) 16:26, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

because talk pages r informal and 1 does not aim 4 the highest possibel standrads. standards u and the rest of the gang hv msrbly failed 2 achieve on the irving article. 2 much time spent heresy-hunting, no dbt.

which is apparently your only purpose for editing Wikipedia

it's a neglected area 4 sm reason. also, i help u by improving the article on ~~mein fuehr~~ irving, not him.

now, if u hvnt alr., pls check my user contrib.s 4 further WP:Point. (dragging an article away from mediocrity surely counts as disrptn on wkpd.) Jamaissur