Talk:Anime Weekend Atlanta

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of the following WikiProjects:

WikiProject Atlanta (Rated Start-Class) Anime Weekend Atlanta is within the scope of WikiProject Atlanta, dedicated to improving Wikipedia's coverage of Metro Atlanta. For more information see the project page. Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale. WikiProject Georgia (U.S. state) (Rated Start-Class) Georgia (U.S. state) Portal This article is part of WikiProject Georgia (U.S. state), an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Georgia (U.S. state) on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page to join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale. WikiProject Anime and manga      (Rated Start-Class) Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anime and manga, which aims to improve and expand anime and manga related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page. Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the assessment scale. CON This article is supported by the Conventions work group.

[edit] Possible references

• Staff writer (December 2005). "Con Report: Anime Weekend Atlanta". Newtype USA 4 (12): 99. 
• Lillard, Kevin (November 2006). "Con Report: Anime Weekend Atlanta". Newtype USA 5 (11): 97. 

[edit] Historical tag

Okay, the article was tagged to have some historical review or something. Even after reading the wiki on the tag, i don't have a clear idea what they think should be added to the article...RCHM 21:11, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

History of the convention, perhaps even year-by-year, would be good. Check Anime Boston for an example. By the way, sign your Talk page posts using four ~ marks. --PatrickD 18:59, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

oops, thought i did. After looking at that AB article, it seems kind of excessive in details for the purpose of identifying the convention in an encyclopedic fashion. I would think it should be kept to the more momentus events to keep from getting verbose.RCHM 21:11, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] There's no official history to cite

AWA is working on an official history would could be cited. Obviously we are a little busy at the moment. Patrick AWA 15:51, 10 July 2007 (UTC)